We rest our case.
£25,000 is the common sense budget.
Hopefully both you and the infamous Mr Begg will recall your derogatory comments of our wonderful educational, informative, accurate, colourful website www.mitrehouse.com, namely, in case you ever forget:
Mr Begg 7 Nov 2016 - a real classic and I quote "Just answer, please, the straightforward questions put to you and stop telling me they have already been aswered somewhere in past correspondence,
NOT included in Schedule of Works - December 2013
or s.20 Notice dated 22 June 2014
Must ONLY be viewed on a decent size screen - not a mickey mouse mobile...!
YES INDEED, Michele, your email dated 10 December 2015 @ 12:23 maintaining "Paul, I vaguely remember requesting a break-down of the costs for the refurbishment @ Mitre House. Could you please forward this on as by now you should have all the documents in place as the accounts have been finalised. Just the information would be great. Thanks, Michele"
(1) 2014 Service Charge Accounts were published and distributed on 30 May 2015 giving lessees a six month window to request documentation or make queries...
(2) Your request came on 10 December 2015, slightly OVER the legallly enforceable deadline, and was the ONLY request received to date from you - no "vaguely" BEFORE unless you can prove otherwise subsequent to publication on 30 May 2015 as indeed you had been requesting all manner of items to be told to AWAIT PUBLICATION OF THE ACCOUNTS WHEN ALL DOCUMENTATION WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE - true or false or do you wish to see copy emails...???
NOT included in Schedule of Works - December 2013
or s.20 Notice dated 22 June 2014
ALL included in Schedule of Works - December 2013
or s.20 Notice dated 22 June 2014
NOT included in Schedule of Works - December 2013
or s.20 Notice dated 22 June 2014
Type your paragraph here.
Type your paragraph here.
Observations made and noted
The Schedule of Works - 7 February 2014
Management are obliged to follow Head Lease requirements which is to paint & decorate, as well as repair and maintain the Communal areas of Mitre House.
Lessees cannot be required to pay for improvements nor cosmetic additions unless ALL Lessees agree to the additional expenditure over and above the minimum works required to be done.
If Management proceeded with expenditure over and above the minimum outlay required, those Lessees that do not wish to spend more than is minimally required can apply to the LVT for retribution and full reimbursement.
In February 2005 a Communal Sky Dish was proposed and a Section 20 Notice was raised, but one Lessee objected to the expenditure and the project was shelved.
As such, Management's Internals' budget of £25,000 incl. VAT adequately covers all that is required to paint & decorate, and repair and maintain the Communal areas and will not include any improvements or cosmetic items if they cannot be accomplished within the £25,000 budget.
Observations made and noted
Due to (some) Lessee requests
Due To (Some) Lessee requests
Management & Lessees NOT
requiring Solar Panels
(Management ) & Lessees NOT requiring Mirrors - Management in favour at some time
(Management) & Lessees NOT in favour of Carpets - Management in favour at some time
Contractor/Supplier TBA
All or some Quotes can now be considered somewhat out of time and might need re-quoting for better accuracy
Still under consideration but requires 100% agreement of ALL nine Lessees - see 2005…?
Contractor/Supplier TBA
Contractor TBA
Contractor TBA
Contractor TBA - but only minimum required being Main Front Door furniture - NOT Lessees
Contractor TBA
Contractor TBA
Contractor & Works TBA
Management NOT recommending a Pro-floor clean due to cost - and TO PROVE A POINT compare WADE QUOTE
Contractor TBA
Management are NOT recommending a
total Lift Refurb due to cost
Contractor TBA
Lessees' Analysis is NOT accurate and does NOT incl. VAT
Professional Tender Specifications
WADE QUOTE (03/7/12 & 23/1/13) is THE Preferred contractor by Lessees for ALL Works and TOTALS a whopping £60,000 - £65,000 incl. VAT - Earlier Quotes (Stopps) was also considered too expensive by KFH (Stopps became WADE Design)
Management NOT recommending a single Contractor
Must ONLY be viewed on a decent size screen - not a mickey mouse mobile...!
Management have sourced many quotes from many independent contractors as opposed to one main contractor as Management knows that this is the more economic way forward when budgets are of prime importance.
It is perfectly normal, legal and acceptable that ALL single main contractors farm work out to sub-contractors and most normally load the sub-contractors quotes by anything from 10% - %40 as indeed the example below amply evidences.